Friday, April 22, 2011

People who care about steroids in baseball are stupid

It’s clear that we’re going to discuss steroids and baseball for the next 40 years and there’s nothing we can do about it. There’s really no avoiding it as players associated with P.E.D’s are either voted into the baseball hall of fame or excluded from it. If “cheating” players like Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens are let in it will lessen the integrity of the hall of fame and if they’re not let in some of the best baseball players ever will not be in the hall of fame, also lessening its integrity. So while I am so sick of debating something as trivial and stupid as steroids, I better get ready for another half century of arguing about it.

It seems people either fall into two camps regarding this issue. You either think steroids have somehow ruined the integrity of the game or you just don’t see what the big deal is. I personally fall into the not giving a shit about it camp and mostly because I’m just sick of the “debate” over it which I pointed out before, will never end.  Before I lose my sanity completely let’s just stop caring so much about something we can’t change.

That’s the thing about the whole mess that makes absolutely zero sense to me. Why investigate it at all? What will it prove and who will benefit from it? I think the answer is that clearly no one benefits from it.  Let’s look at this, baseball takes a credibility hit for allowing players to use “cheating” substances, the players of this era lose all credibility, and the fans get reminded everyday that for the last 15 years we watched “tainted” baseball. The worst part is that because of this stupid debate I will have the mental picture of Jose Conseco injecting a needle into Mark McGwire’s ass for the rest of my life.

I apologize, but not allowing the best players I have ever watched play into the hall of fame is not going to help anything. I will always remember Roger Clemens as the best pitcher I’ve ever seen and Barry Bonds/Alex Rodriguez as the best home run hitters I’ve ever seen. Who gives a shit if a plaque gets put up at the boring baseball hall of fame in boring Cooperstown, New York? Seriously, I grew up outside of Utica, New York and Cooperstown makes Utica look like metropolitan area.

Let’s just stop pretending that it’s steroids that are lessening the integrity of the game as if the MLB has any integrity to begin with. We’re talking about a league that instead of putting in some kind of salary cap decided to implement a luxury tax to apparently give incentive for bad teams to not spend money on their players. Then the media makes the Yankees out to be evil for spending money yet cheers on the signings of other big market teams like the Phillies and Red Sox while ignoring that the Pirates make money purposefully screwing over their fans and not putting a competitive team on the field. It is a ridiculous and a totally unfair system but most people just think it’s just the Yankees who make it unfair.

It goes beyond just the salary structure though. I watch games nightly with wildly different strike zones and see numerous blown calls on the base paths that could easily be corrected with a replay system. The outcome of games being determined by the umpires lessens the integrity of the game far more than steroids. We should not have to guess what the strike zone is every night and there is no way in hell we should have to deal with blown calls on the bases, especially not in 2011. Between this and the salary issue baseball has far bigger issues to take care of to strengthen baseball’s integrity than a wild goose chase trying to figure out what players did or didn’t take performance enhancing drugs.  

What’s truly amazing about the entire thing is that NOBODY has empathized with the players and when I say nobody, I mean nobody. Like if we were all in the same position we wouldn’t have done the same thing? Also, in most of the cases we’re looking at, the substances in question were legal when they were taken, so we’re really going to punish players for that? It’s just insanity that we hold athletes who for the most part are uneducated to this super high moral standard. Politicians, CEO’s, and Wall Street investors knowingly cheat us out of our own money every single day but we feel more cheated because baseball players hit too many home runs in the late 90’s and early 2000’s?

It just doesn’t make any sense, none of it. It doesn’t make sense we’d care about steroids in baseball when it’s pretty obvious that they play a far bigger role in other sports. It doesn’t make sense that we’d care about it more than we care that some teams spend 200 million on their players and some 25 million. It doesn’t make sense that we think steroids effect the games more than umpiring. Let’s just be rational about this, steroids are not an issue, we are making them one. In no way does investigating players who’ve taken them in the past prove anything or benefit anyone and not allowing some of the best players ever into the hall of fame certainly doesn’t solve anything. If you feel you’ve been that cheated by these players just trying to get better at the sport they entertain you by playing, then get over it because you’re most likely being cheated in ways that have actual impact on your life. So yeah, I’m a little down that we have to talk about it for the next half century. 

Friday, April 8, 2011

Call of Duty Fucking Sucks

This is supposed to be somewhat a golden age for videogames. There are three consoles that all have perks and supposedly the next big videogame innovation with motion control. However, while we’ve upgraded our televisions to HD and 3D and use a motion sensitive controller or ourselves as a controller now, the games we play have stayed almost identical. The most blatant example of this is the Call of Duty franchise, which has set the standard in being total crap.

I know this kind of talk gets COD fans furious and I’ll agree with them that Call of Duty 4 was a pretty sweet game. This was mainly because of its innovative multiplayer, not because it was remotely innovative anywhere else, i.e. see the bajillion other first person shooters or the previous iterations of the series. Now after Call of Duty 4, Call of Duty 4: World War II, Call of Duty 4: Again, and now Call of Duty 4: Cold War, I’m officially spent with this series. Activision couldn’t manage to remotely change the game play from any of these editions? I think adding a mode where you shoot zombies was about the biggest change from game to game and this itself was ripped from another game series.  Also, don’t you think we’ve reached the quota on how many games you can charge people 60 dollars for that involve killing zombies?

The current reiteration of Call of Duty 4 is called Black Ops but I’m not really sure why. I refer to it as Cold War because killing everything in sight during the Cold War is not what I’d call covert or secretive. The title implies that it is something different but it’s really the same shoot everything illogical pile of garbage. Unfortunately, this repetitive and uncreative game is the best selling game in the history of United States videogames.

Maybe I’m missing something here, but did or did not Activision release the same game with a new setting, a new unacceptably short and illogical campaign, and a slightly tweaked multiplayer 4 times with higher sales numbers each time? It’s unbelievable and the worst part is because these games are selling so well companies are copying Call of Duty’s shitty and uninventive format so they can get a bit of these stupid American’s cash.

Maybe it’s just that I’m tired of virtually shooting things for no reason or maybe it has to do with the uncivil people you have to deal with on Xbox Live. Either way, I’m sick of paying 60 dollars for a game that clearly doesn’t have a single bit of creativity put into it and won’t be purchasing Call of Duty 4: Again 3 when it comes out this fall. I recommend you think about doing the same, or at least think at all at some point in your lives because god knows a lot of Call of Duty fans could benefit from some thought once in a while.